Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:24:54 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=l44klKqe9KUslD2/dkPwHo1lbx1GR55Jr2AYA6ldE1U=; b=jox3vo1hoeGd+ceJqblmDVKYGOYJIg9DRt0AqYL0Y8et3FyLBUQhzWywZTL8uJTqXz MRGZa0giQR0n7uYIoUpeBkgAxeJgvRBKWKJKVT5syZBvx4DcGB/JndLdlg6eNJVMDAzM DI8RVbmKKjCiC6e/y6gpDxZh5rSEQ51sR1/uY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZxRIkAeVxaczDqhL5rrzBKCT+iTsUkhf4/oQGRR7KhvMkWjvaNZm70CaBiGNDBM59+ wKbbVCJMaXeUpqjPkGyo4V2nI/Py8OCC00LG2d2/tuweWUglEjN03fFW7OpSJsTFRmpG i2hLkosDUsXzwNaXI+lBG266j/+FMuNxnpKFM=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <006901cbb595$e50b51f0$4001a8c0@lark>
References: <[email protected]> <532F7D4648B74CCF825F0D0E596655AF@home2361108df7> <006901cbb595$e50b51f0$4001a8c0@lark>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thanks for the FAST response to my cap switch box question: I got 3 within 20 minutes on and off the list.  It's good to see people here are so helpful, even when the question may seem a trivial one.

I'll make an order for a bunch of the recommended caps tonight and some thicker wire for the loop. The loop antenna does seem to be a good solution for me as I can use the same arrangement on a number of bands. With my QRP power levels I can also tune it indoors - I think.

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 16 January 2011 15:56, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote:
Or "5" caps 1,2,4,8,16...... really 5 switches becasue you may need to
parallel caps to meet these values. I suggest the high voltage pulse-rated
caps that we (Andy et al) were recently talking about using in high power PA
tuning. I use WIMA PHE 428 series, which I think I got from RS (Farnell do a
RIFA equivalent) I guess they were about 75p each a few years ago. Very high
voltages are generated across the loop when you apply power, so its a shame
to subject good quality caps in a sub box that that kind of treatment (yup I
am a test equipment hugger :-))  )

You will probably want a smaller "granularity" than 1nF, so you may need to
include a 470PF and a 500pF wide spaced variable in the box, especially if
as you quote it is a high Q loop.

Alan G3NYK


----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 3:32 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?


> > across the capacitance can be very many times larger than that at 50
ohms.
> >
> > So, I need *to build a capacitance selection box with values from around
> > 0-30nF with sufficient resolution to fine tune a hi-Q loop*. I will need
> > the
> > capacitors to be rated sufficiently high voltage to cope with any power
> > level I am likely to put into the loop antenna (almost certainly never
> > more
> > than 20-30W though).
> >
> > My questions are these:
> >
> > (a) what is the best *choice of capacitors* - type, voltage working,
pulse
> > behaviour, accuracy, price?
> > (b) what is the *simplest arrangement* to give me the adjustment
accuracy
> > and range I need with the fewest parts and fewest switches?
> >
> > Any advice would be appreciated.
> >
> > 73s
> > Roger G3XBM
>
>
> Well, to do 1nF to 30nF in 1nF steps, you need six caps and six switches -
>
> 1, 2, 2, 5, 10, 10nf caps
>
> all in parallel,  with a (toggle?) switch in series with each capacitor.
>
> Martin  GW3UCJ.
>
>
>
>





--
g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
www.g3xbm.co.uk
www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>