Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?

from [Stefan Schäfer] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:29:05 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <532F7D4648B74CCF825F0D0E596655AF@home2361108df7> <006901cbb595$e50b51f0$4001a8c0@lark> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
Hi Roger,

Am 16.01.2011 17:24, schrieb Roger Lapthorn:
I'll make an order for a bunch of the recommended caps tonight and some thicker wire for the loop.

Well, maybe its better to use several thin (enamelled) wires in parallel, say 10x 0.5mm diameter instead of 1x 1.5mm.

73, Stefan/DK7FC
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:  LF: Re: RE: PC 15-01.jpg, mal hamilton
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?, John Bruce McCreath
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]