Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Eu QRSS freq....

from [Tony] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Eu QRSS freq....
From: Tony <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:16:03 +0000
In-reply-to: <007301cb8405$5dc7a8e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <2BE70532063C4C12A0E3AD8515E27D57@White> <002d01cb83f5$f4842c00$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <007301cb8405$5dc7a8e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
On 14/11/2010 14:08, mal hamilton wrote:
The good days on the lower frequencies are gone, definitely not attracting new comers, the numbers speak for themselves.
I must say the other mf band 160 metres is vy active world wide with CW acty
73 de mal/g3kev

There would have been one more newcomer active by now Mal, but when I first posted on this forum I was ridiculed when I asked what sort of wire was suitable for a LF aerial.
Then I was told that I would be wasting my time if I didn't have 100 foot vertical towers and run a KW++, so rather than waste my time as there is no way I can get away with tall towers... I gave up.
Now back (mostly) on the civilised bands above 10m.

Tony, EI8JK.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: VX9BDQ - WSPR, John Bruce McCreath
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Eu QRSS freq...., mal hamilton
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Eu QRSS freq...., mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Eu QRSS freq...., mal hamilton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]