Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: WSPR window |
| From: | John P-G <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:28:46 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| Organization: | The Gammy Bird |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <000f01cb7ba6$b2802040$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:17:58 +0000 Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: > Most transceivers can be operated in split mode now, isn't this a > workable solution ? > And anyone with separate Tx / Rx setups has got split frequency > operation by default Andy, LF, Yes, I can (and have done) operate in Split mode - as I have separate RX and TX - but my point is that we should all be in the same place - I believe the concerns over "strong locals will drown the weak DX" is fallacious. As long as the string locals aren't transmitting 100% duty cycle there is room for all on a single 200Hz frequency span. You only have to compare the density of active stations of 500kHz with those on 30m to see. John GM4SLV |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR window, John P-G |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR window, John Bruce McCreath |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR window, Andy Talbot |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR window, Paul-Henrik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |