To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSPR window |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:17:58 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sMQOZ/lg5E7F5cofDzB00Ujrc8ftDV3pL+jylbfdTTE=; b=iuzUKYmScq+le4WDztfr4C1F8yCEX0FlZOw6ZbqnBiKESJX/NbVpgxJ7Kjdpy1eBRh 2O8b4WMe1gRwMSI/PH9KPgKvKA5JLYjnXhocmGxto7VvEeibrutU86eJmLDMuzLMNU0q 8zPoHV/mdYEuSZDgvVfZr9lHtQIxZWjFkCVFg= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pMSfu3FC0UYCCE+mt4mbiCQWY7D9gTWuj9FZpxEFcWbw5100PhlrI8i7M8d6JAyVzj 6UAlrtsZ0NeSJQELGTMWrcEFboc9NnrUBx9cFhL5WiSNrF2kcdc5JhR7NdFWB4EEYRLP ZRWaHv31uEdqQpB1HRgkZTrdXb04B5iJddvBM= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <000f01cb7ba6$b2802040$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Most transceivers can be operated in split mode now, isn't this a workable solution ?
And anyone with separate Tx / Rx setups has got split frequency operation by default
On 3 November 2010 23:07, Paul-Henrik <[email protected]> wrote:
WSPR is a "party-line" mode by default, you have to receive where you transmit. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR window, Paul-Henrik |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR window, John P-G |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR window, Paul-Henrik |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR window, John P-G |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |