To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Loops on TX |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:55:03 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1285625036; bh=XfvHzSsjiStLUe6j9joBbnroy1XRya98l8u1z54e8n0=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=KPnkFLZFzC2Zyfvk2y3CMT+IS+llH1QC8dPDydtsV66WyworZEYgPSZFHG9y2lqsAPWrU5PG0Rz3Qzj9MCMde7whHdwBj/p8qr+5aOC/KQJzil/8Z5QMiEyZR46haHEOKJ0VcZ8zadfHay6iMyKUCpSt1EKflQw/zCmTimqECHI= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=EppCIvMtB/9bRzW9EPrpP/nZ3VG4QlkJMTzxxeoPYZ8iQr+Q5/ZheWkuTGSuqlNyLTPFgmD4pJZz90rGtI9wasItqvw2W2srKzDgnASMXWuw3ZsvmROPHF2tj3X4kuqvbT5KH797Bfzccy57oJnd+DmHfnoxU3hD13SVLaVKS4s= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Stefan you can put lossy ground in but you cant really rely on the results at LF with any version of NEC I know of. Alan G3NYK. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:38 PM Subject: Re: LF: Loops on TX > LF, > > Am 27.09.2010 22:14, schrieb Scott Tilley: > > If someone knows the relationships for how a loop behaves over ground > > I'd love to see them too! > > Can't this be done in EZNEC? > > Scott, this sound really impressive. I have thought your loop area is > even higher. So, if i can find and climb some trees, i could try to test > a closed loop as well. Sounds like an alternative, maybe. > > What about RG213 as the loop conductor, i mean the shielding? If the > supports are not spaced to much, like some trees, this could work. > Starting with a small wire, carrying a bigger one and so on. Oh dear, so > many ideas, help! > > 73, Stefan > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Loops on TX, jrusgrove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Loops on TX, Scott Tilley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Loops on TX, jrusgrove |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Loops on TX, Scott Tilley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |