AW: LF: Re: 9 kcs

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	AW: LF: Re: 9 kcs
From:	Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 6 Jun 2010 21:26:42 +0200
References:	<004801cb04d6$e9740b80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <CD190EC05BA84C1685A9A2F4A56DD284@JimPC> <001101cb054f$49a29c60$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <52F731AEBF244DE99A2D6D5162CE2296@JimPC> <[email protected]> <002301cb05a6$4a0172b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
Thread-index:	AcsFpuO1qufGuLtfQh+dt/AxggNbFgABk20m
Thread-topic:	LF: Re: 9 kcs

Mal wrote:
>It is easy to generate a 9 kcs signal and high power audio amplifiers are
>plentiful to radiate several K/watts to a loaded inverted L 20 + metres
>high.

You should take that "/" and place it between "kc" and "s"! Than both units 
would be written correctly: kc/s (= kHz) and kW! It's so easy! Or have you 
meant Kelvin per watt?

Stefan/DK7FC

<<winmail.dat>>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: VLF 9 kcs: preamp and antenna noise, (continued) LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: VLF 9 kcs: preamp and antenna noise, mal hamilton LF: Re: Re: 9 kcs, mal hamilton VLF: Receive converter for the VLF band, Mike.WE0H LF: Re: 9 kcs, Mike.WE0H LF: Re: 9 kcs, James Moritz Re: LF: Re: 9 kcs, Wolfgang Büscher Re: LF: Re: 9 kcs, mal hamilton LF: Re: 9 kcs, Mike.WE0H LF: Re: Re: 9 kcs, mal hamilton LF: AW: Re: 9 kcs, Stefan Schäfer AW: LF: Re: 9 kcs, Stefan Schäfer <=

Previous by Date:	AW: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:	Re: AW: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US?, Bill de Carle
Previous by Thread:	LF: AW: Re: 9 kcs, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Thread:	LF: 500 signals, mal hamilton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]