Re: LF: Probably not a new question...

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Probably not a new question...
From:	Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:44:03 +0100
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=lHiNA+ByozTdFyPRD/DzU5arH8kyjbXM1cFyJBGs8xQ=; b=VRgPwsIQ19G4OFGDV0pAiEj7JoOWNBQQw4WmhqPB3FsB7GWXpz2fQu44cazuyaQo8Y tTNqnbTSFAJkl0agzo1HcU6+vjS8padk4nY+wPsTZgyvXfDGPIVMBbyb+twvxmtZvY9Y 9Q4kt5J7kg4SkdipAsJYQQza5/tkyweebJuF0=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=H9fntY1X61p9+S/WSXR5pur7ZA5UjoN+bOc+eEi+ggbB/OQoE1CmA+Br/kHJ9bfuLW CGUt0pinqnarXwvqXkYArXFbN6cFEAAQPTaqpFRODrDLbBV3vP/h1zYlO02bzyZMCQZ6 Ty1QC91iI1YKT5Pl+nRI3ZeE/0aWTIvHFnc9k=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<C841AB3DF1584779832A164969EF4A73@PCCasa>
References:	<C841AB3DF1584779832A164969EF4A73@PCCasa>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Daniele,

I can endorse most of the replies to your query.

I have a JRC NRD-345 HF receiver, it is very good from 10kHz to 30 MHz. I can highly recommend the transverter route as I have built a transverter for Tx & Rx which covers from 600kHz down to about 3 kHz. You can see my design & work (and others) on the UK500KHZ Group web site at :-

http://groups.google.com/group/uk500khz/web/low-frequency-converters

Gary - G4WGT.

On 26 April 2010 18:23, Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi LF,

among the so-called "communications receivers" (0.1-30MHz, all modes, well-known brands, etc.) in the "< 300 euros" price range (used, of course :-)), which models have good characteristics at LF frequencies?

Any recommended models (in the same price range) outside of the "comms receivers" class?

Many thanks for your feedbacks.

Cheers

D.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., (continued) Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Alberto di Bene Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Graham LF: W1VLF Test., Paul A. Cianciolo LF: Re: W1VLF Test., Alan Melia Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Johan H. Bodin Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani LF: RE: Probably not a new question..., James Cowburn Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., John Bruce McCreath Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Gary - G4WGT <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., John Bruce McCreath
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., John Bruce McCreath
Next by Thread:	LF: VE7TIL 2200m Beacon reactivated..., Scott Tilley
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]