Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Probably not a new question...

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Probably not a new question...
From: "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:37:02 +0200
In-reply-to: <4EB4F8217FCC42CAB07AE666A6AB07B8@AGB>
References: <C841AB3DF1584779832A164969EF4A73@PCCasa> <4EB4F8217FCC42CAB07AE666A6AB07B8@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
Yes, or building a simple "SoftRock style" direct conversion front end
and feed the audio to the soundcard for further processing by Winrad or
similar software capable of processing I/Q audio. What you need is some
kind of preselection filer, a quadrature mixer (half-complex mixer,
"Tayloe mixer") and a pair of good audio preamps. The front end LO can
be as simple as an XTAL oscillator followed by a 74HC74 that divides the
XTAL frequency by 4 and produces the two 0/90 degree clocks needed by
the mixer. A 74HC4052 analog switch works quite well as mixer on LF,
this one can be clocked by the 'HC74 mentioned above or any other 2-bit
synchronous binary counter clocked by fLO*4. The tuning is done in the
software.

You can find some ideas at

  http://yu1lm.qrpradio.com

or look at Gerald Youngblood's QEX article series "A Software Defined
Radio for the masses"

  http://www.flex-radio.com/News.aspx?topic=publications

73 de Johan SM6LKM

Graham skrev 2010-04-26 20:55:
> You may  be  better  building a LF convertor ?
>  
> G ..
> 
> *From:* Daniele Tincani <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 26, 2010 6:23 PM
> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Subject:* LF: Probably not a new question...
> 
> Hi LF,
> among the so-called "communications receivers" (0.1-30MHz, all modes,
> well-known brands, etc.) in the "< 300 euros" price range (used, of
> course :-)), which models have good characteristics at LF frequencies?
> Any recommended models (in the same price range) outside of the "comms
> receivers" class?
> Many thanks for your feedbacks.
> Cheers
> D.
>  
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>