Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Probably not a new question...

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Probably not a new question...
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:32:28 +0200
In-reply-to: <FD6D8E8A468143B0A140CEB16F993229@PCCasa>
References: <C841AB3DF1584779832A164969EF4A73@PCCasa> <4EB4F8217FCC42CAB07AE666A6AB07B8@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <FD6D8E8A468143B0A140CEB16F993229@PCCasa>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
Z-usanet-msgid: XID497oDZwGf3472X36
On 4/26/2010 10:59 PM, Daniele Tincani wrote:
but I believed that top-rated 
radio's like Racal, Eddystone, R&S, W-J, etc. distinghished over the others 
because of their superior construction, even from a mechanical point of view 
(no wide-band circuits, lots of metal screens, etc.). How is this level of 
quality achieved in modern SDR's?
  
It looks like you are putting "top-rated" radios and "SDR" radios in two different sets, whose intersection is the null set.
Nothing is farthest from the truth... look here :


This is an SDR radio, by R&S

73  Alberto  I2PHD

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>