Hi Alberto,
thank you very much for
clarification. I was misled by the softrock example :-)
Anyway, a doubt persists...I read on
the frontpanel of the R&S SDR that it is a "digital wideband
receiver"...Well, in my "prejudice", "wideband" does not match with
"high-quality", unless the radio contain several different "narrow band"
receivers. Is this (apparent)
conflict solved at the digital signal processing level?
Regards
D.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:32
AM
Subject: Re: LF: Probably not a new
question...
On 4/26/2010 10:59 PM, Daniele Tincani wrote:
but I believed that top-rated
radio's like Racal, Eddystone, R&S, W-J, etc. distinghished over the others
because of their superior construction, even from a mechanical point of view
(no wide-band circuits, lots of metal screens, etc.). How is this level of
quality achieved in modern SDR's?
It looks like you are putting "top-rated"
radios and "SDR" radios in two different sets, whose intersection is the null
set. Nothing is farthest from the truth... look here :
This is an SDR radio, by R&S
73
Alberto I2PHD
Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo. Controllato da AVG -
www.avg.com Versione: 9.0.814 / Database dei virus: 271.1.1/2835 -
Data di rilascio: 04/25/10 20:31:00
|
|