Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Probably not a new question...

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Probably not a new question...
From: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:50:48 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <C841AB3DF1584779832A164969EF4A73@PCCasa> <4EB4F8217FCC42CAB07AE666A6AB07B8@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <FD6D8E8A468143B0A140CEB16F993229@PCCasa> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Alberto,
 
thank you very much for clarification. I was misled by the softrock example :-)
Anyway, a doubt persists...I read on the frontpanel of the R&S SDR that it is a "digital wideband receiver"...Well, in my "prejudice", "wideband" does not match with "high-quality", unless the radio contain several different "narrow band" receivers. Is this (apparent) conflict solved at the digital signal processing level?
Regards
D.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Probably not a new question...

On 4/26/2010 10:59 PM, Daniele Tincani wrote:
but I believed that top-rated 
radio's like Racal, Eddystone, R&S, W-J, etc. distinghished over the others 
because of their superior construction, even from a mechanical point of view 
(no wide-band circuits, lots of metal screens, etc.). How is this level of 
quality achieved in modern SDR's?
  
It looks like you are putting "top-rated" radios and "SDR" radios in two different sets, whose intersection is the null set.
Nothing is farthest from the truth... look here :


This is an SDR radio, by R&S

73  Alberto  I2PHD



Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo.
Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com
Versione: 9.0.814 / Database dei virus: 271.1.1/2835 -  Data di rilascio: 04/25/10 20:31:00
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>