Re: LF: Probably not a new question...

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Probably not a new question...
From:	brian hodgson <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1272306999; bh=U4irGhRWQdutnnpsJsjTZXAcon20IZvC3VnPvaax1H0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HKM5nLT2/OhqUJnsBdfBx3Pcrhc7mCSBIxmqoVPQIADwD/b16bJhoh2xmIosyFr375NNL+nY9ah288GaHGYdLFaVklmP+CX9MZjoH/k7NM4G9R5bbdB4xZSc/jkkq8R2/dwf24GqQl3Jik7ZtFBy7k27SyK3nnAgfq5ur9KHnNg=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yGZ8zIVuD/fgy1iEJBK1txio4/siuLXs0DbyG0CPlEMLAX1H0Gjep8Z6YQmlVRHxg199nVVhLegkx4n44194c4w5YRqZZtNCGvbRQUmxE+KCcIZd5gLKlOTG91xViFNwpTDjgAiVrP05zbI4X9tSv8rqQbDMydCVs0oFlxZL7D4=;
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<C841AB3DF1584779832A164969EF4A73@PCCasa>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi Daniele -

I'm very pleased with the Kenwood TS850 - it cost £400 but it means I now have a spare HF transceiver.

It is sensitive up to 504 kHz without modification (and all the way to 30 MHz with a simple wire link). With some other (fairly easy) modifications it can also produce about a volt of SSB at 501 - 504 kHz.

Brian (G3YKB)

--- On Mon, 26/4/10, Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Probably not a new question...
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, 26 April, 2010, 18:23

Hi LF,

among the so-called "communications receivers" (0.1-30MHz, all modes, well-known brands, etc.) in the "< 300 euros" price range (used, of course :-)), which models have good characteristics at LF frequencies?

Any recommended models (in the same price range) outside of the "comms receivers" class?

Many thanks for your feedbacks.

Cheers

D.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., brian hodgson <= Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Graham Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Marco IK1ODO Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Wolfgang Büscher Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Andy Talbot Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Alberto di Bene Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Alberto di Bene LF: LF Activity VO land, jcraig

Previous by Date:	LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Graham
Previous by Thread:	LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Graham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]