To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Probably not a new question... |
From: | Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:11:04 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <C841AB3DF1584779832A164969EF4A73@PCCasa> <4EB4F8217FCC42CAB07AE666A6AB07B8@AGB> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
Beware, the Perseus doesn't work at a few kHz; it's nice for LF (where I use it too), but not for the lower VLF range. The reason is, I guess, the input filter which has an "L" between the input and ground (unlike SDR-IQ) . Cheers, Wolf . Marco IK1ODO schrieb: At 20.55 26/04/2010, you wrote:You may be better building a LF convertor ?G ..I agree... probably a better choice, if you already have a _decent_ HF receiver. If not... consider buying a Perseus, but the price is 4,4 dB higher than your target :-) Otherwise, Racal 1792, Eddystone 1650, Rohde&Schwarz EK081, all in the 500-1500 Euro range. I don't consider amteur radio receivers to be good radios, expecially at LF.73 - Marco IK1ODO |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 500 kHz ROS Beacon, Gary - G4WGT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Probably not a new question..., Daniele Tincani |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |