Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... |
| From: | "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:38 -0000 |
| References: | <000a01cac139$b9d5e5a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <9D7C2F9B306347BEA848AC1560D1162B@JimPC> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B54@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B56@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
It is important for ID that the TX was keyed otherwise it could be any carrier. Positive ID is needed otherwise the experiment is meaningless de G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Nicholson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 7:45 PM Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... > Markus wrote: > > He mentioned he had been attempting QRSS 10 for DF8ZR up > > to about 16:30, > > The signal was strongest up to 15:00, very narrow bandwidth too. > > Then there was a gap until about 15:20 or so, when the signal > came back weaker and with some spread until just after 16:00. > > It is important to know if the tx was CW or keyed during those > times. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 3C85 cores, Johan H. Bodin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., rn3agc |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Paul Nicholson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., rn3agc |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |