To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:45:00 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <000a01cac139$b9d5e5a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <9D7C2F9B306347BEA848AC1560D1162B@JimPC> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B54@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B56@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) |
Markus wrote: > He mentioned he had been attempting QRSS 10 for DF8ZR up > to about 16:30, The signal was strongest up to 15:00, very narrow bandwidth too. Then there was a gap until about 15:20 or so, when the signal came back weaker and with some spread until just after 16:00. It is important to know if the tx was CW or keyed during those times. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., rn3agc |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 3C85 cores, Johan H. Bodin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Alexander S. Yurkov |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |