Such scepticist you are, Mal. Any data can be analysed. By the way
frquency is some ID by itself. And certanly we are looking for more
proof.
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, mal hamilton wrote:
> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:38 -0000
> From: mal hamilton <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test...
>
> It is important for ID that the TX was keyed otherwise it could be any
> carrier. Positive ID is needed otherwise the experiment is meaningless
> de G3KEV
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Nicholson" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 7:45 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test...
>
>
> > Markus wrote:
> > > He mentioned he had been attempting QRSS 10 for DF8ZR up
> > > to about 16:30,
> >
> > The signal was strongest up to 15:00, very narrow bandwidth too.
> >
> > Then there was a gap until about 15:20 or so, when the signal
> > came back weaker and with some spread until just after 16:00.
> >
> > It is important to know if the tx was CW or keyed during those
> > times.
> >
> > --
> > Paul Nicholson
> > --
> >
>
Regards,
Alexander
|
