Re: LF: KITE ANT

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: KITE ANT
From:	Dominic Baines <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:45:56 +0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=q6CDU8OYd810hZqyjMnvHHiEdgW8CxRk5q7RIl9Ej0U=; b=R6fbywL/R4/IIqsaIWWUY/XyuGcTZrU+Dbpe2nrt5ZBO6GUboZRKHcy5Om3wWYa1gY V69bo3eXFCxAxPWu99r/ozkQ95VxjPsZ2OKA6Cs/o2mPD9JdeHnyidww+0Gb66xUH11y 4OuPBe48i7qZmq/VcnTjenP6dCGHO5Kyfotdw=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NPtNGsurThsBmGp6qAm6rx8Hl3YSn/Egb8iNs5e9dRs8cAkQN2ST/dx0/q7b3X89Bg +HFxSQa61qvYGFmJ8ZCadooOw1WLnexUjHOpWF4AAgrDAZEiKkPYVhrBeAvRF3jDkmlt lTNykDSk35g4YWCg7pFNyr6GN0no9Lb+imQko=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<001901cabfab$5e35afd0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References:	<001901cabfab$5e35afd0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Mal,

One option is to use helium balloon/parafoil kites pretty sure UK
amateur G4VG flies a 160m antenna this way, when no wind the balloons
work fine, when wind picks up switches to more normal kites.
http://www.qsl.net/g4vgo/

72

Dom
M1KTA

On 9 March 2010 17:10, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sounds good if one could ORDER wind when flying the KITE, too hit and miss
> for reliable communications.
> Another DREAM. I am still waiting for a two way Dream 9 QSO, why the delay!!
> Hire a helicopter for an hour or so to support the antenna at several
> hundred feet high, move the helicopter up and down for resonance !!
>
> G3KEV
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: KITE ANT, mal hamilton Re: LF: KITE ANT, Alexander S. Yurkov LF: RE: KITE ANT, Chris Trayner Re: LF: KITE ANT, Dominic Baines <= RE: LF: KITE ANT, Jean-Louis . RAULT Re: LF: KITE ANT, Dominic Baines Re: LF: KITE ANT, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: KITE ANT, Paul Nicholson Re: LF: KITE ANT, pws AW: LF: KITE ANT, Stefan Schäfer Re: AW: LF: KITE ANT, pws VLF: Teflon, Stefan Schäfer Re: VLF: Teflon, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: KITE ANT, Gary - G4WGT

Previous by Date:	LF: RE: KITE ANT, Chris Trayner
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Possible VLF HV problems, or not?, Paul Nicholson
Previous by Thread:	LF: RE: KITE ANT, Chris Trayner
Next by Thread:	RE: LF: KITE ANT, Jean-Louis . RAULT
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]