To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: AW: LF/MF |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:42:29 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AD00@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AcqGGFYF9XxzmBnkSPGa7Jdvc9EERwAMDxCQAABsNKA= |
Thread-topic: | LF/MF |
Oh, now i can see why ;-) "LF:" is inserted automatically... 73... -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Stefan Schäfer Gesendet: Samstag, 26. Dezember 2009 17:36 An: [email protected] Betreff: LF: LF/MF Why are the topics affecting 500 kHz not marked as "MF: ..." in the subject? I thought this is the reason why we write "LF: ..." in the subject of mails affecting 137 kHZ? Or have I misunderstood "the rules"? Stefan/DK7FC |
Previous by Date: | LF: LF/MF, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: "WA" beacon received at 503kHz., Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | LF: LF/MF, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: Influence of a TX antenna to a small rx antenna, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |