To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: LF/MF |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:36:21 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <1261823989.6451.9.camel@vaio3rd> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AcqGGFYF9XxzmBnkSPGa7Jdvc9EERwAMDxCQ |
Thread-topic: | LF/MF |
Why are the topics affecting 500 kHz not marked as "MF: ..." in the subject? I thought this is the reason why we write "LF: ..." in the subject of mails affecting 137 kHZ? Or have I misunderstood "the rules"? Stefan/DK7FC |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: XGJ 26-12.jpg, Warren Ziegler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: AW: LF/MF, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | LF: "WA" beacon received at 503kHz., Laurence BY3A-KL1X China |
Next by Thread: | LF: AW: LF/MF, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |