To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:23:12 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aD8EPfeKwZDZeKcS6sROgLKANfU+AshGuf9BQH+JT3Y=; b=FxPnfCBUde/0Wb5BeRGHH5qyxzTf/kSJBQJiwlaydDkY4AvZcTmdcyhQrbr64pMRzE XC2trI+0881PX7hP7DWjzK5izq0whgh18vrr7CGM+C4bdubGPv4hSFkaHuvo/oJp4xkR n5/vLhOBpG5NaYowBTY7fggBS8KqnNYbpO2nU= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wrLoe9lrxTQNPrvK2P8r71Bz3xQgD0y0AhlrilgsD5Ocdn5ynLN4ug0SYmDv4+vyeX pVrRsPUumWdTU72tP09532xMerQRl16jpvkYgsmvXMWvZTLt/ktsHhXXYMmiSDAQmsAm 1j8cpxCszA1AMbGNP/5K6/Y5AjMoXXYSH+yD0= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <op.u463kspnyzqh0k@pc1> |
References: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828ACB3@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <F115BE2FFFB942B48FA14864D7293A44@JimPC> <op.u463kspnyzqh0k@pc1> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Like the sound of that. How did you keep common mode interference induced on the power lead from getting anywhere near the high impedance antenna probe ? Andy www.g4jnt.com This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the health and safety police 2009/12/19 Roelof Bakker <[email protected]>: > Dear James, > >> I think the role of the ground with active whips is often neglected - the >> output of the whip preamp is the voltage differential between the whip >> element and the circuit ground, so the ground connection is just as much >> part of the antenna as the whip element itself is. Clearly, an electrically >> quiet ground is needed for the active whip, whether this is provided by the >> coax feeder or a seperate local ground connection. > > It seems that the requirements for a ground connection are quite relaxed. > I have tested a completely isolated system with the coax running horizontal > tied to a non conduction mast and shoved out of an upstairs window. Signal > strength received with the same system and the mast vertical mounted in the > garden to put the antenna at the same location in space, was within one dB > for a vertical polarised signal. > > I have also build a system with CAT5 cable as a balanced feeder. One twisted > pair was used for RF, the other for power feed. At both ends of the RF pair > rf-isolating transformers were used. This resulted in a very low local noise > pick up. > > Using a common mode choke at the antenna end does not change anything at all > either. My guess is that the antenna element is so small, that even a small > (capacitive) coupling is good ebnough for a ground. > > Best regards, > Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt > > > |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals, Roelof Bakker |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals, Roelof Bakker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |