LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz

from [Graham]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz
From:	"Graham" <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:05:02 -0000
References:	<000001c87a63$13267ea0$8700a8c0@rtv5f9d8dfdf44> <[email protected]> <004901c87abb$636f7120$0301a8c0@g3kev> <005c01c87ac6$079f68e0$6d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <006501c87acb$75ea7ab0$0301a8c0@g3kev>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

That's quite well summed up ! and was one of the reasons for the 'Timedbeacon software' , each end could run itand still see what was happening on the band.... dont have to be on thesame frequency and would of given a plot

over time ...

Just need someone to  code it :(

G ..

Beacon acty would be an indicator for you if propagation was optimum but
unattended beacons would be pointless, if one was not in a position to go
into QSO mode immediately given the right conditions.

To respond immediately a link on 3.5/7 mhz would be useful to indicatecopy

at either end and the link needs to be monitored in real time for a quick
response.
As far as I can see this is the only approach that will work.
73 de Mal/G3KEV

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: [500] G3LDO, Lubomír Bobalík LF: TA on 500kHz, Peter Dodd LF: Re: TA on 500kHz, mal LF: TA on 500kHz, jrusgrove LF: Re: TA on 500kHz, mal LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz, jrusgrove LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz, Graham <= Re: LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz, Andy Talbot Re: LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz, Graham LF: test - pls disregard, Dave G3WCB. LF: G3LDO 500kHz rig, Peter Dodd LF: RE: G3LDO 500kHz rig, Ken Wright Re: LF: [500] G3LDO, Peter Dodd

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: TA on 500kHz, G0MRF
Next by Date:	Re: LF: TA on 500kHz, Jay Rusgrove
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz, jrusgrove
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz, Andy Talbot
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]