Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:16:50 -0000
References: <000001c87a63$13267ea0$8700a8c0@rtv5f9d8dfdf44> <[email protected]> <004901c87abb$636f7120$0301a8c0@g3kev> <005c01c87ac6$079f68e0$6d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <006501c87acb$75ea7ab0$0301a8c0@g3kev> <003d01c87adc$1a8a1570$0e00000a@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Ok Andy,
 
I see you have changed it ! looks like thats getting close , running that and say,  speclab at a very slow
refresh would give the path/time info ?
 
Tnx - G ..
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: TA on 500kHz

There have been 18 downloads of  the beacon timing software  PCBCN  this month.  Its still there...
 
 
Andy  G4JNT

 
On 29/02/2008, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
That's  quite well summed up ! and was one of the reasons for the 'Timed
beacon software' , each end could run it
and still see what was happening on the band.... dont have to  be on the
same frequency and would of given a plot
over time ...

Just need someone to  code it :(

G ..


> Beacon acty would be an indicator for you if propagation was optimum but
> unattended beacons would be pointless, if one was not in a position to go
> into QSO mode immediately given the right conditions.
> To respond immediately a link on 3.5/7 mhz would be useful to indicate
> copy
> at either end and the link needs to be monitored in real time for a quick
> response.
> As far as I can see this is the only approach that will work.
> 73 de Mal/G3KEV
>






--
Andy  G4JNT
www.scrbg.org/g4jnt


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.2/1304 - Release Date: 2/29/2008 08:18
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>