To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:19:52 +0100 |
Delivery-date: | Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:21:47 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <002f01c62991$0082b2c0$a1558351@w4o8m9> |
References: | <000701c62720$be51b3a0$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL><[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002f01c62991$0082b2c0$a1558351@w4o8m9> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) |
Zitat von James Moritz <[email protected]>: Dear Ed, LF Group, Just quickly checked your HF frequencies, which are 14213.650kHz and 14349.972kHz to the nearest Hz - this will make the difference frequency 136.322kHz, +/- 2Hz. Will be monitoring the frequency this afternoon. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU Hi Ed, hi Jim, I confirm. slightly QRH downwards to the end of each line/dash. both QRGs QSA 9 +20dB using a beam with 5dB gain on 14MHz. regards Uwe/dj8wx |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, Jay Rusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, Jay Rusgrove |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |