Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures |
| From: | "hamilton mal" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:36:15 -0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:41:29 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
| References: | <000201c627fa$e6299570$e6a4c593@RD40002> <001b01c62802$9941a6a0$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> <000501c62816$793c8a00$2201a8c0@pcroelof> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:34 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures Hello Jay, Jim, LF-group, I used the same measurement setup. The buffer amplifier of the mini-whip has a loss of 4 dB. This has of course implications for the input intercept points. Best regards, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt Hi Roelof Your antenna sounds interesting and could be useful under certain environmential condx , urban areas with lots of noise but in my case it would be hard to beat my vertical out in the countryside, however if you send me one of these antennas I will try it out at various heights and let you know the results. 73 de Mal/G3KEV |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: TA tonight, Jay Rusgrove |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: HF2LF, hamilton mal |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, Roelof Bakker |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, Roelof Bakker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |