LF: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures
From:	"Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:34:01 +0100
Delivery-date:	Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:35:01 +0000
Envelope-to:	[email protected]
References:	<000201c627fa$e6299570$e6a4c593@RD40002> <001b01c62802$9941a6a0$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hello Jay, Jim, LF-group,

I used the same measurement setup.
The buffer amplifier of the mini-whip has a loss of 4 dB.
This has of course implications for the input intercept points.

Best regards,

Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: TA 1 FEB 06, Jay Rusgrove LF: RU6LA acty 3-5 Feb and HF2LF, Ed Lesnichy LF: Re: HF2LF, Ed Lesnichy LF: HF2LF, Ed Lesnichy LF: J310 IMD figures, Roelof Bakker LF: Re: J310 IMD figures, Jay Rusgrove LF: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, james moritz LF: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, Jay Rusgrove LF: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, Roelof Bakker <= LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, hamilton mal LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, Roelof Bakker Re: LF: J310 IMD figures, Andre Kesteloot Re: LF: J310 IMD figures, Roelof Bakker Re: LF: J310 IMD figures, Andre Kesteloot LF: Re: HF2LF, hamilton mal LF: HF_MF2LF #1, Ed Lesnichy Re: LF: HF_MF2LF #1, uwe-jannsen LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, James Moritz Re: LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, uwe-jannsen

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Re: COILS, Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ
Next by Date:	LF: AW: TA 2 FEB 06, Thomas Eckart
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, Jay Rusgrove
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: J310 IMD figures, hamilton mal
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]