To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:46:03 -0000 |
Delivery-date: | Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:49:21 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
References: | <000701c62720$be51b3a0$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL><[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002f01c62991$0082b2c0$a1558351@w4o8m9> <001701c629bc$0cebac80$5d3c8351@w4o8m9> <002901c629cb$e6e97fc0$5d3c8351@w4o8m9> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Ed, LF Group, I checked all the screen shots taken from 1400 - 2200utc, but unfortunately no recognisable signals from RU6LA in the 136kHz band were detectable. CT1DRP was visible at the beginning and end of the period, also a quite strong but unidentified signal just above 136.318kHz appeared a couple of times. The QRN level was quite high after about 1700 here. I was able to copy all the HF signals from RU6LA, check the frequencies, and set the LF RX frequency accordingly, so I'm confident if there was a signal to be seen, it would have been on the screen. So, for the time being at least, it seems the best way of transmitting a signal on 136k is to use an LF transmitter :-) Thanks for running an interesting experiment, Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: GPS locked tests, uwe-jannsen |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: HF_MF2LF #1, Wolf DL4YHF |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |