| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 |
| From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:43:35 -0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:47:09 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
| References: | <000701c62720$be51b3a0$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL><[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002f01c62991$0082b2c0$a1558351@w4o8m9> <001701c629bc$0cebac80$5d3c8351@w4o8m9> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Ed, LF Group, Now seeing your signal on 1882.318kHz. On 873kHz, I see basically 3 carriers, of similar strength, on 873.000kHz, 873.001 and 873.008kHz. This would put the 3rd order product on 136.302kHz, 136.316kHz or 136.318kHz, depending which carrier is effective. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, MarkusVester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, James Moritz |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, James Moritz |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1, James Moritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |