To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Timing GPS |
From: | "Stewart Bryant" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:28:38 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <20040210184134.KTHX20454.tomts35-srv.bellnexxia.net@smtp.bellnexxia.net> |
References: | <20040210184134.KTHX20454.tomts35-srv.bellnexxia.net@smtp.bellnexxia.net> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
If GPS is not an option, then NTP (clock timing via the Internet) might be an alternative. There is some info on accuracy at http://www.ntp.org/ntpfaq/NTP-s-algo.htm#AEN2361 - Stewart G3YSX [email protected] wrote: Greetings All:Judging by the lack of replies to this thread - there seems little interest here. A very great pity, as accurate GPS locked timing is the next great improvement we could make to LF signalling.This discussion is exciting. Please, if this moves forward make the system a general design that can be moved around and configured for different uses beyond LF. I also encourge that the system be useable for extremely weak signals and also for very short duration burst signals simultaneously. Wouldn't be great if the worlds propagation beacons on all bands could be upgraded to allow effective 24x7 monitoring of the signals. Larry VA3LK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 3rd Rus LF_#1, Ed Lesnichy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Timing GPS, John Andrews |
Previous by Thread: | Re: RE: LF: Timing GPS, kayser |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Timing GPS, John Andrews |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |