Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VO1NA TX The real explaination

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA TX The real explaination
From: "Joe Craig" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:10:44 -0230 (NDT)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>

Lots of good guesses, but the real answer is that at 00:59:60 tomorrow morning I'll be radiating imaginary 2200m
photons using the jX component of the antenna impedance
instead or the customary R component. Because |X| >> R at LF, the efficiency will be very close to 100%. If Alberto can include an imaginary time axis (to 0090Z) in his latest build of ARGO then everyone should get an O copy. Could get a bit messy with all the j squared omega terms in the FFT's.... negative frequencies and going back in time, etc.. which could result in major temporal violations. Real 2200 metre photon emission will resume at 0100 to 0900Z, assuming I know what I'm doing.

Joe

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Alberto di Bene wrote:

Jay Rusgrove wrote:

>Well that's a fine kettle of fish. I had no idea you were operating in a
>special time slot (0059Z - 0090Z). Guess I've been missing out on a lot
>of activity! Is there a function in Argo that accomodates this or a
>special "alternate time" interface box? I'm guessing an interface box -
>but does it go between the antenna and the receiver or the receiver and
>the computer? Please send details...
>
> > I tried to code time-accelerating functions in Argo, but got a visit from the temporal police, warning me about possible violations of the Warp rules set forth by the space-time committee in 2167 AD. They would fine me for any violations of the laws of physics, expecially for escaping from the light cone. They mumbled something on the lines of "... if everybody would do that,
how could we then control cause-effect relationships ? "

73  Alberto  I2PHD








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>