Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: The leT/A of the law |
| From: | "Hugh" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:28:43 -0000 |
| References: | <[email protected]> <003201c2ea71$3706ed00$20c5e150@hughspc> <001f01c2eb0d$9bd93200$045bfea9@RSGB613192> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Andy, I am terribly sorry, I confused you with somebody else. There are no scurrilous fibs and the fantasy is all in my head. I agree with what you say about the scientific purposes of the transmissions, and that is really the point I was trying to make - that the "regulations" need to be brought into line with what we are doing. This was done to allow packet radio, and APRS so why not QRSS on LF (or any other frequency for that matter ?) 73 Hugh M0WYE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re. DX working, Vernall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: UA9OC last night, Dave Pick |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: RE: The leT/A of the law, Andy talbot |
| Next by Thread: | LF: re UA9OC ...??, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |