To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Loop vs Marconi |
From: | "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:18:06 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <3DD35969.30941.58250D@localhost> <004801c28bb7$b2c00580$015e89d9@jackie> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hello Steve and Jay,I simulated a 15m high / 30m long loop at 1m above ground (Er=5, S=0.1mS/m) using MMAMA. Results were : The loop is actually fairly omnidirectional - just not at 0 degrees elevation. As you move up from 0 degrees elevation the pattern starts to "fill in" nicely in the direction of the "nulls". The nulls are minimal at an elevation of about 30 degrees (but still -15..20dB) Tilting the loop didn't change the radiation pattern (vertical polarization), but it just probably reduces the radiation resistanceNot sure, but I think you can prove this with a small receive loop while nulling out a local broadcast station. Tilt the loop even slightly off vertical and away goes your null in a hurry. The above assumes not "electrical pick-up". Maybe the nulls in a RX loop get smaller when tilting the loop because the magnetic component decreases while the electric component almost remains. |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Loop vs Marconi, Jay Rusgrove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Loop vs Marconi, Steve Thompson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Loop vs Marconi, Jay Rusgrove |
Next by Thread: | LF: Calibrating LF Current Meters, g6tmk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |