Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+slow\s+WSPR\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: IK1WVQ Mauro <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:31:51 +0200
Hi to all, it is true what OPERA mode is "secret", but, I think, it is better than WSPR for semplicity: on-off carrier , no time synchronisation required (then it is possible to made a simple beacon
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00083.html (14,032 bytes)

2. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:29:45 +0100
OPERA "problems" I think clover , packtor and other commercial big $$ modems are also 'private' ? anyone is free to write a dsp decode engine , we have the numeric side ! , the fact that the systems
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00100.html (16,502 bytes)

3. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: Sabine Cremer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:47:15 +0200
Hi all, hm, I am just not understanding why we need a "slow WSPR"? In my opinion, WSPR is designed to allow a high channel efficiency, e. g. lots of stations can position their beacons in a very smal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00194.html (15,097 bytes)

4. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:46:48 +0200
Hi Markus, Thanks for your opinion. OK, i will ask Joe and will forward his answer. Better not to copy his adress simply into CC here ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Hi Stefan, LF,   if I remember correctly, Ri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00334.html (16,075 bytes)

5. LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 01:09:50 +0200
It's a pity that there is no slow-WSPR, e.g. needing 32 minutes or so. If WSPR (2 minutes FSK) is about as efficient as OP8 ( i heared so), then it should be a real alternative to the slow DX modes o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00344.html (12,494 bytes)

6. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:18:40 +0100
The preferred modes for commercial operators is still CW and MSK on the LF/MF bands. Radio amateurs are trying to re-invent the Wheel only to end up with CW and MSK. Taking everything into considerat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00399.html (11,406 bytes)

7. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:43:15 +0200
Hi, Question: why do all those professional services for submarines down at LF/VLF use MSK and not any kind of that advanced stuff you are talking about? As far as I know they are using non-linear tr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00407.html (10,644 bytes)

8. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:41:21 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Stefan, LF, if I remember correctly, Rik's careful evaluaton of SNR performance in February resulted in a threshold for reliable decoding of -23 dB for Opera-2, versus -29 dB for WSPR. This is car
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00510.html (15,446 bytes)

9. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:07:59 +0100
Stefan, Maybe it is worth approaching K1JT with a suggestion/request that a slower version of WSPR be created? It has been several years since WSPR was first released (2008) and there is a lot of sen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00624.html (13,432 bytes)

10. Re: LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:25:36 +0100
''It's a pity that there is no slow-''WSPR'' And a even bigger pity, very few stations would be able to transmit it ! HF wspr and OP 2 modes are broadly similar , remembering , wspr is a peak recodin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00692.html (13,396 bytes)

11. LF: slow WSPR? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:45:09 +0200
Hi Rik, Am 12.09.2012 14:05, schrieb Rik Strobbe: Hello Sabine, as mentioned in the report the test were done off-air, by adding equal amounts of pure white noise to WSPR / Opera signals of identical
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00705.html (12,265 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu