Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Separate\s+Receiving\s+Antenna\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:00:40 +0100
Hello Tony, nice to see a message from you after long time. I remember our QSO's on 137kHz in the late 90's. Big antennas have the reputation of being poor RX antennas, maybe because they overload th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00029.html (12,340 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:09:55 +0100
Hello Tony, a quick and dirty simulation of the 125m tower shows a radiation resistance of 1 Ohm and a capacitance of 2.5nF (what is a reactance of 460 Ohm at 137kHz). So you would need only 0.55A an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00092.html (12,702 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:39:51 +0100
Thanks Claudio the mast is grounded via a choke. Unfortunately the inductivity is to low for 136kHz. So we have to change it. But we will be careful. 10kV is not for joking. 73 de Toni
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00202.html (11,575 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Claudio Pozzi <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:34:30 +0100
May be that with this huge mast you can have some problem with static electricity. Athmospheric Efield, in qiet days, is about 100 V/m, so 10 kV from the top of the mast. Provide a good DC grounding
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00258.html (11,886 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:40:42 +0100
Hi Tony, We haven't had QSO before but i am looking forward with interest to your LF activity and hope to be QRV as well. I am using a 100m or 300m vertical antenna and i am QRV in regularly CW. You
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00410.html (12,139 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:30:03 +0100
Hi Toni, Thanks about the weblink. Yes, 1 W ERP can be done with a QRP TX, supplied by a 9V block battery ;-) BTW i just remembered your call from some HF QSOs i think. Do you have a digital logbook?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00564.html (14,270 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:29:58 +0100
Hi Tony Use the same antenna for both TX/TX. This is what I do at my QTH and if works very well. On RX some control over gain would be convenient to set the optimum front end RX gain. ie an adjustabl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00576.html (12,009 bytes)

8. Re: LF: RE: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 07:47:06 +0100
Good morning LF Group and many thanks dear Rick, Alan and Jim for the very interesting answers. It's a pleasure to chat again with you. Yes, the ancient times will revive for a couple of nights! We w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00647.html (11,773 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:48:37 +0100
Hi Mal Thank you for the response. So I will take my attenuator box to the site, connect the mast to the RX and see what happens. It will be difficult to get a receiving antenna far away enough, and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00658.html (11,985 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:36:30 +0100
Hi Toni, Thanks about the weblink. Yes, 1 W ERP can be done with a QRP TX, supplied by a 9V block battery ;-) BTW i just remembered your call from some HF QSOs i think. Do you have a digital logbook
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00857.html (16,289 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:57:31 +0100
Hi Tony, We haven't had QSO before but i am looking forward with interest to your LF activity and hope to be QRV as well. I am using a 100m or 300m vertical antenna and i am QRV in regularly CW. You
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00924.html (14,120 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:54:21 +0100
Dear Toni, LF Group, It will be difficult to get a receiving antenna far away enough...> Unlike Mal, I have used seperate RX antennas for several years on 136k, due to local QRM picked up by the TX a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00961.html (13,433 bytes)

13. LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:42:39 +0100
Dear Toni, LF Group, You may find that the big mast works well as a receiving antenna, if it is well seperated from sources of QRM from mains power etc. When using the 100m mast at the Puckeridge ex-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg01041.html (12,357 bytes)

14. LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:52:37 +0100
Hi Toni this is like the old days :-)) nice to have a chance to chat again. My thought is how far could you get say a loop away from the vertical?? if it must be quite close you will need to detune t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg01060.html (11,881 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu