Dear All, When a scientist builds a bridge it will collapse, but the scientist can perfectly explain why it collapsed. When an engineer builds a bridge it will not collapse, but the engineer will not
have a look here : http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4563568 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Chris Trask
Hi All This article may be of interest http://gmweb2.net/The%20FS%20Loop.htm 73 Tony VK2IC On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Clemens Paul <[email protected]> wrote: Antenna engineers use to say about des
Hi John, I agree in principle with your opening paragraph. However, I do believe it is irresponsible and perhaps reprehensible tp publish without qualified peer review a paper making such strong clai
I think in theory that patent is then null and void!! However theory and practice are in theory the same, but in practice they rarely are :-)) Alan true. It just has to be useful. That is, it enables
interest > > > > > > http://gmweb2.net/The%20FS%20Loop.htm > > > > > > It might also be unsupported hype !! to judge from the tone of the text !! > rather, scan it). My first > reaction (I might be
Just wait until you read the rest of his electromagnetic fantasies, such as the part where he claims that there is no magnetic field in a propagating EM wave. He's not the first one to create new EM
Antenna engineers use to say about design goal limits of antennas: Small Efficient Wideband Pick any two (meaning you can't have all three...). 73 Clemens DL4RAJ Dear Daniele, LF Group, Regarding ban
Yes Chris, And to put it another way, electronic engineering is both an art and a technology. The one explains the smoke, the other is the methodology of keeping the smoke in the works. The guys who
Hi Mal, Am 21.08.2011 20:02, schrieb mal hamilton: Look at it this way. An air wound coil by itself will induce a voltage into a radio receiver whereas a ferrite rod by itself will NOT, so the ferrit
From an engineering point of view, a scientific theory does not have to be true. It just has to be useful. Hello John, a bold statement ;-) But it is true that for an engineer the priority is that it
I've managed to find time to read it (or rather, scan it). My first reaction (I might be mistaken) is that he claims familiarity with the works of Hertz and Tesla but seems not to be terribly aware o
It might also be unsupported hype !! to judge from the tone of the text !! Alan G3NYK Hi All This article may be of interest http://gmweb2.net/The%20FS%20Loop.htm 73 Tony VK2IC On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 a
Oh my god. the ferrite rod has never been the 'antenna' energising the coil, antenna coil energising the ferrite rod! What a complete and utter pseudo-scientific nonsense. 73, Wolf DL4YHF .
Don't forget elecro magnetic spin. Some years ago the theory said that an atom was indivisible!!!!!!!!!!! Some past so called established scientific theory has now been proved wrong Give the subject
From an engineering point of view, a scientific theory does not have to be true. It just has to be useful. That is, it enables us to build something to meet our needs and for an acceptable cost. For
Look at it this way. An air wound coil by itself will induce a voltage into a radio receiver whereas a ferrite rod by itself will NOT, so the ferrite rod enhances the air wound coil. Is it a question
