Hello Alexander, Wolf, Johan, Andy, Thanks for your reply, opinion and advice! I will do my choice and i tend to use the PICs since i have worked whith them before 9 year (just for a few months)... T
Well, I know nothing about the Atmel aprat from teh fact that is exists :-) There are plenty that love the range and won't touch PICs, but as you say its like Linux / Windows - never the twain... Eve
Hi Stefan, Wolf BTW using FpGA from Xilinx or Altera anybody can easy build CPU with any instruction set you like. Whith all perepheral devices (and RAM) in the same crystall. It's my favorit 'toy' n
Hi Claudio, indeed, the nice asynchronous counter (which processes signals way above the pic's clock frequency) doesn't exist in the Atmel chip ... some builders of this PIC based frequency counter s
I used both, 16Fxxx PIC series and ATMEL ATMEGA series. PIC require assembly programming for best performance and require also an hardware programmer. ATMEL can be programmed in standard C/C++ langua
Hi Stefan, I used both (PICs and Atmels, ATmegas, and a bunch of others) and would suggest to .. - avoid 14-bit PICs (they are really dreadful if you need to do arithmetics, and there is only a "pseu
Dear group, especially Andy/G4JNT, Maybe a little out of topic but very useful for LF/VLF devices: Programming microcontrollers. Before some years i worked with some PIC controllers, assembler. But i
