Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Pic or Atmel? |
| From: | wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:34:29 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Hi Claudio, you wrote: Last: with PIC 16Fxxx is easy to make a 40 MHz frequency meter, with AT MEGA xxx it's impossible without external HW, so... I use both but I prefer ATMEL ;-) indeed, the nice asynchronous counter (which processes signals way above the pic's clock frequency) doesn't exist in the Atmel chip ... some builders of this PIC based frequency counter successfully 'tortured' it to count up to 70 MHz ;o) http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/freq_counter/freq_counter.html 73, Wolf . |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Alpha benchmark, Piotr Mlynarski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Alpha benchmark, Roger Lapthorn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Pic or Atmel?, Claudio Pozzi |
| Next by Thread: | LF: OE5ODL VLF received in France, f4dtl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |