Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Pic or Atmel?

from [wolf_dl4yhf] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Pic or Atmel?
From: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:34:29 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 

Hi Claudio,

you wrote:

Last: with PIC 16Fxxx is easy to make a 40 MHz frequency meter, with AT MEGA
xxx it's impossible without external HW, so... I use both but I prefer
ATMEL ;-)
indeed, the nice asynchronous counter (which processes signals way above the pic's clock frequency) doesn't exist in the Atmel chip ... some builders of this PIC based frequency counter successfully 'tortured' it to count up to 70 MHz ;o) 

http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/freq_counter/freq_counter.html



73,
  Wolf .
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Alpha benchmark, Piotr Mlynarski
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Alpha benchmark, Roger Lapthorn
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Pic or Atmel?, Claudio Pozzi
Next by Thread:  LF: OE5ODL VLF received in France, f4dtl
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]