To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Pic or Atmel? |
From: | "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:39:21 +0000 (GMT) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Stefan, Wolf On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: > - ATmegas, even the tiniest ones, have a much nicer instruction set > (compared with 14-bit PIC core) and are thus more suited for compiled > languages like "C". BTW using FpGA from Xilinx or Altera anybody can easy build CPU with any instruction set you like. Whith all perepheral devices (and RAM) in the same crystall. It's my favorit 'toy' now :-) What about Atmel and Microchip it seems to me better chip is chip you familar :-) Another essential difference is absent. Regards, Alex/RA9MB |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Dream 9, mal hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Dream 9, Gerhard Hickl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Pic or Atmel?, wolf_dl4yhf |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Pic or Atmel?, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |