Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Pic or Atmel?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Pic or Atmel?
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:44:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6

Hello Alexander, Wolf, Johan, Andy,

Thanks for your reply, opinion and advice! I will do my choice and i tend to use the PICs since i have worked whith them before 9 year (just for a few months)...

Tnx, 73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 20.01.2011 19:39, schrieb Alexander S. Yurkov:
Hi Stefan, Wolf

On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, wolf_dl4yhf wrote:
- ATmegas, even the tiniest ones, have a much nicer instruction set
(compared with 14-bit PIC core) and are thus more suited for compiled
languages like "C".
BTW using FpGA from Xilinx or Altera anybody can easy build CPU with any
instruction set you like. Whith all perepheral devices (and RAM) in the
same crystall. It's my favorit 'toy' now :-)

What about Atmel and Microchip it seems to me better chip is chip you
familar :-) Another essential difference is absent.

Regards,
Alex/RA9MB




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>