Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Pic or Atmel?

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Pic or Atmel?
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:12:40 +0100
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Dear group, especially Andy/G4JNT,

Maybe a little out of topic but very useful for LF/VLF devices: Programming microcontrollers.

Before some years i worked with some PIC controllers, assembler. But in the German ham radio newspaper you rather find circuit examples programmed on an Atmel device. Now i want to buy some software and programming devices for microcontrollers and asking myselfe what i should choose, Pic or Atmel. Maybe its a question like Windows or Linux? ;-)

My question would be what is the difference and the advantages/disadvantages. Is there a preferred device for practical purposes?

Examples for what i want to do with a Pic or Atmel:

-Programming a DDS VFO
-A/D / D/A conversion of LF/VLF signals
- Programming a beacon TX for 8970 Hz, directly driving a psuh-pull FET stage
- Maybe a DCF-77 RX for generating a reference signal?
-Regulators for battery charging
-combinations of the above

and and and

I would be thankful for useful comments and hints.

73, Stefan/DK7FC




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>