Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+An\s+\"LF\-reflector\"\s+Yahoo\s+group\s+instead\s+\.\.\.\.\.PLEASE\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:55:03 +0100 (BST)
Yes, I agree with you Mal, and that's why I sent the 'no thanks' message after Roger outlined the "advantages"....and it's got even worse now someone has suggested vetting group members! Chris, G4AY
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00270.html (20,925 bytes)

22. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 21:31:09 +0100
I wonder if I am on the HIT list de G3KEV the Station for Information and Education No big deal Chris. I have my own banning system. People with negative attitude are going straight to my spam folder
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00305.html (16,860 bytes)

23. LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 22:51:25 +0100
With the latest outage (5 days already) may I again suggest that the LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group? In over 10 years I have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or problems with any group
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00321.html (12,528 bytes)

24. RE: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh_M0WYE" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:09:53 +0100
Hello Group, I am another &#8220;lurker&#8221;, but have greatly appreciated the LF reflector over the years. I also have a Yahoo account and follow other radio-related groups on there, so I would be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00351.html (19,237 bytes)

25. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 01:08:21 +0100
I'm interested in LF. I don't have the equipment or the space.. for LF operation <<< With the advent of modern QRP operations , with 500 mW in the Ae and 500 watts in the PC , operating at LF is no l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00397.html (15,512 bytes)

26. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:38:33 +0100
Chris, Would you prefer an open group to have more spam'bots than real members?? that is what the "registration" is for on Majordomo as well, all sub requests go to the owner. These days one needs to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00412.html (16,623 bytes)

27. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:17:04 +0000
Greetings, The constituency, expertise and variety on this group is magnificent and we mess with this at our peril. The benefits of a Yahoo group over the venerable Blacksheep are plain. That's _A_ Y
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00422.html (13,379 bytes)

28. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 17:44:16 +0100 (BST)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00435.html (19,841 bytes)

29. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 18:03:10 +0200
On 5/24/2012 4:32 PM, Roger Lapthorn wrote: You can post to a Yahoo group by email or via the group website. Likewise you can receive posts as emails , a daily digest email or just look at posts on a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00456.html (12,931 bytes)

30. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 21:55:48 +0200
I vote for yahoo.) 73 Clemens DL4RAJ -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] mal hamilton To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 P
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00479.html (16,577 bytes)

31. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: ALAN MELIA <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:43:56 +0100 (BST)
NO you would not be excluded. The normal way is to accept joining requests which post a sensible note to the owner (i.e not from a spambot) then your first mssage is moderated (i.e. looked at for rel
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00481.html (15,610 bytes)

32. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:51:19 +0200
Am 25.05.2012 16:38, schrieb Alan Melia: [...]Once your address is on the spammers list you never get off it. And one needs an extra yahoo email account to join to a yahoo group, right? I remember th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00510.html (12,806 bytes)

33. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:42:25 +0100 (BST)
Hello Group, I am another lurker, but have greatly appreciated the LF reflector over the years. I also have a Yahoo account and follow other radio-related groups on there, so I would be quite happy
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00568.html (21,633 bytes)

34. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:58:13 +0100
No Stefan, you do not. You can sign in with your usual email address. 73s Roger -- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00579.html (13,754 bytes)

35. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:19:09 +0200
Roger, An interesting idea. I have 2 questions about the proposed Yahoo group: Would I have to login manually whenever I wish to check for new e-mail, or can I leave it to the e-mail application on m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00587.html (10,432 bytes)

36. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:08:58 +0100
Yes, I agree with you Mal, and that's why I sent the 'no thanks' message after Roger outlined the "advantages"....and it's got even worse now someone has suggested vetting group members! Chris, G4AYT
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00595.html (18,346 bytes)

37. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 21:22:28 +0100
Do you mean Radio amateurs being vetted by some Appliance operator that does not know the difference between a Euro and a Lira -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Alberto di Bene To: rsgb_lf_
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00608.html (14,028 bytes)

38. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:11:54 -0700
Honestly, this move is a no brainer IMHO. I agree. In addition, there will be a ton of storage space for files, photos etc, not to mention the ability to search archival postings. Steve WEB - "The VE
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00612.html (11,833 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu