Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 91 ]

Total 91 documents matching your query.

21. LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: VE7TIL heard in Southern Oregon... (score: 1)
Author: "WE0H" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:47:52 -0500
He he he... Wait until this winter when I put some oomph in a 166kc & 136kc signal pointing your way... Got ear plugs eh??? Mike WE0H WD2XGI --Original Message-- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00096.html (12,044 bytes)

22. Re: LF: clicking matching transformer... (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 01:44:36 -0500
Hi David, What would you recommend for a supply voltage with 500v FET's in your Quarter Kilowatt linear amp design? Mike WE0H WD2XGI [email protected] wrote: In a message dated 17/07/2004 20:32:33 GMT St
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00123.html (11,797 bytes)

23. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:05:06 -0500
Oh boy, wait until Bill reads this. Your in for a whipping Mal. Hi hi... 73's, Mike WE0H WD2XGI hamilton mal wrote: For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS are the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00156.html (10,806 bytes)

24. LF: Re: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:31:53 -0500
Well Mr Mal, We US of A operators don't have any LF Amateur Radio bands so we can't drive our loops with the same level of power you run. I don't know why Bill Ashlock hasn't jumped in here, but in m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00173.html (13,646 bytes)

25. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:05:30 -0500
No YOU want coverage in all directions. All antennas have disadvantages. Chill out Mal. Prozaq does wonders for symtoms like this. LOL!!! Later, Mike WE0H hamilton mal wrote: -- Original Message -- F
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00177.html (14,568 bytes)

26. Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:56:09 -0500
Bingo, 'Ego Trip'. Mike WE0H WD2XGI [email protected] wrote: Actually, that is not strictly true. If an experiment does not agree with theory then both the experiment and the theory need to be re-evaluat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00204.html (9,617 bytes)

27. Re: LF: IRAQ (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:05:06 -0500
Hey Mal, Could you post some of those pics on a server for all of us to see? That would be nice to see some old ham radio pics. Mike WE0H WD2XGI hamilton mal wrote: Story I was a technical advisor wi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00205.html (10,530 bytes)

28. Re: LF: Re: F6BWO (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 10:43:33 -0500
Mike WE0H Scott Tilley wrote: Mal We're all working hard over here to make your life more interesting :) 73 Scott,VE7TIL -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] hamilton mal To: rsgb_lf_gr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00011.html (11,773 bytes)

29. Re: LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:27:04 -0500
That is so you guys can hear Mal :-D :-D calling you on 7025. Later, -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI captbrian wrote: I'm new around here so :- Why cross-band ? bryan G3GVB -- Original Message -- From: g3kev.ham
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00019.html (11,567 bytes)

30. Re: LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:05:50 -0500
-- Mike WE0H WD2XGI [email protected] wrote: In a message dated 8/3/04 3:49:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: That would be a pity......... What, the demise of LF? Don't worry,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00023.html (9,189 bytes)

31. Re: LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:03:15 -0500
High school was 20 years ago with college in between. Grow up loser >:o Mike hamilton mal wrote: -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] WE0H Mike To: [email protected] rsgb_l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00034.html (11,888 bytes)

32. Re: LF: Where is everyone ? (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:37:38 -0500
I think everyone got scared away by you know who or there is too much non radio stuff going on this weekend. :-) -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI I've received nothing from either the LF or Microwave reflectors i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00057.html (9,375 bytes)

33. Re: LF: QRSS origin (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:34:11 -0500
I vote for the chicken. Where else would the egg come from? :-D Later, -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI Dexter McIntyre W4DEX wrote: Mike Dennison wrote: I originated the term QRSS many years ago in an e-mail to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00170.html (10,728 bytes)

34. Re: LF: Static (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 13:34:56 -0500
Maybe you or Granny next door have some of those noisy lamps in the house? My loops are always quieter than my vertical. Later, -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI hamilton mal wrote: The QRN static is still bad on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-09/msg00028.html (9,238 bytes)

35. Re: LF: 160 (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:28:44 -0500
WOW :-D -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI hamilton mal wrote: The 160m band condx are a good guide to 137 khz and yesterday evening was good. Early evening worked easterly as far as 4X4 and UA4 but did not hear an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-09/msg00060.html (8,776 bytes)

36. Re: LF: wd2xdw on test (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:03:56 -0500
Laurence, Rain doesn't bother the tuning on a TX loop like it does on a vertical. Only wind will make the tuning move around but still not too bad. Nice to hear another fellow looper. Try #8 THHN wir
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-09/msg00082.html (9,717 bytes)

37. LF: Re: wd2xdw on test (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:59:16 -0500
I think Laurence is sleeping now but it most likely is a vertical loop. -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI captbrian wrote: Is this a horizontal loop or vertical please? G3GVB Bryan . The loop is I think 14 gauge s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-09/msg00084.html (9,726 bytes)

38. Re: LF: VO1NA last night (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:33:34 -0500
Darn Ashlock loops work good ehh?? =-O -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI James Moritz wrote: Dear LF Group, Signals from VO1NA have been following a familiar pattern here for the last few nights, with fairly weak
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-10/msg00043.html (11,265 bytes)

39. Re: LF: xdw making the lights dim in Okie (and they do) (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:29:20 -0500
Laurence, She's looking a bit healthy up here tonight. I think ur gonna re-define Dogbones. :-D Later, Mike Ive invoked the Decca amp (thanks Crawley club!) and it needs a bit of tweaking, but we are
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-10/msg00077.html (10,536 bytes)

40. Re: LF: xdw making the lights dim in Okie (and they do) (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:37:06 -0500
He he he, audible TX loop signal :-D Yep he is smokin my receiver tonight. Gotta love those loops huh? I have a feeling the vertical guys will re-think their antenna idea. Now we need to see Scott pu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-10/msg00078.html (10,486 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu