Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Static

from [WE0H Mike] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Static
From: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 13:34:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <000c01c49078$54a6a860$4ceafc3e@l8p8y6>
References: <000c01c49078$54a6a860$4ceafc3e@l8p8y6>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Maybe you or Granny next door have some of those noisy lamps in the house? My loops are always quieter than my vertical.

Later,
-- 
Mike
WE0H
WD2XGI


hamilton mal wrote:
The QRN static is still bad on 137khz and 160 metres. Receiving 137 Khz signals on my 80 metre loop suffers just the same as my vertical. Both produce the same level of static. The theory about loop advantage over a vertical is not correct.
A very small loop might be different. I have never used one so do not know. Trying to DX last night on 160 was a problem.
Nothing heard beyond SV2
73 de Mal/G3KEV :-!
 




















[More with this subject...]










<Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread>




















Previous by Date: 
LF: Static, hamilton mal




Next by Date: 
LF: RTTY around 137,650 at 19:30 UTC, f6agr




Previous by Thread: 
LF: Static, hamilton mal




Next by Thread: 
Re: LF: Static, hamilton mal




Indexes: 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists]