Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 271 ]

Total 271 documents matching your query.

81. AW: LF: oe5odl ZAA? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:47:06 +0100
I fully agree with Walters opinion! You have a very good station and do a good job in activating the band! We all profite of the active stations. If there would be no activity, nobody would start to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00787.html (12,964 bytes)

82. LF: AW: Re: So much acitvity :-) (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:51:22 +0100
Jim, mni tnx for the QSO! Your signal is the strongest i've ever got from the UK! And tnx that it was a reals QSO, not just rapport and 73... :-) hpe cuagn next weekends agn... 73, Stefan/DK7FC _____
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00815.html (10,494 bytes)

83. LF: AW: I'm proud of this (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:50:59 +0100
Hey Andy! Congrats to that good work! What is your receiving antenna for DCF77? In the web i have found that page: http://www.ptb.de/de/org/4/44/442/index.htm#Kontakt There you can find the adress of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00004.html (10,480 bytes)

84. LF: test signal wanted (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:19:24 +0100
Please, could someone send a test signal (such as CQ...) in QRSS/DFCW on 137.7? I built up the active E-field antenna at the new qth in Heidelberg (city) and want to try the performance. It is just 2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00019.html (11,796 bytes)

85. LF: VLF TX experiments this sunday becomes more probably (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:33:52 +0100
Dear LF group, Tomorrow, the wind forecast is excellent! See http://www.windfinder.com/forecast/frankfurt It is almost to much wind but i have the new kite braid with a strenght of 500kg... So the an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00023.html (15,815 bytes)

86. AW: LF: Loop preamp with the BF862 / optical link (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:52:04 +0100
Hello Jim, Andy, Sam, Ken, Group ;-) Excellent comments! Thank you for these explanations. I see, it is your business. And what i read tells me, that the optic way cannot be the wrong in principle. R
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00041.html (16,861 bytes)

87. AW: AW: LF: Fiber optic components (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:32:12 +0100
Hi Gerhard, Thank you! I haven't known that. The sensitivity of the SFH350V is maximal at 850nm. But at 650nm it is still 57% and thus also usable. But if one wants to get "the perfect system" this m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00048.html (14,378 bytes)

88. LF: VLF test signals? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:58:43 +0100
Which commercial VLF transmitters can actually be received in the 10kHz range? There is much listed in the web but in times where these transmitters are shut down all this may be already old stuff. W
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00089.html (11,406 bytes)

89. LF: test (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:11:11 +0100
test <<winmail.dat>>
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00104.html (8,367 bytes)

90. AW: AW: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:05:37 +0100
Hi Alan, Well, i expect the oxide film losses of the foil should be neglectible, compared to the ground losses. And one has the advantege to reach a high C that is easy to adjust/modify and cheep and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00136.html (14,494 bytes)

91. LF: AW: Beaconing on 8.79 kHz in QRSS (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:00:19 +0100
Hi Horst, Interesting VLF tests! And Alans hint is a good i think. Does one need a special licence for that band in germany? I am almost sure about that ;-) What are the limitations of that licence?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00139.html (9,968 bytes)

92. LF: active ant on metallic mast (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:46:39 +0100
Hi Roelof, LF, Roelof, why do you think that this is the case? Interesting Question! "Won't work" means "Won't work properly" it assume. There will be a signal but perhaps it is not optimal. And why
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00143.html (15,603 bytes)

93. LF:OE5ODL (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:22:00 +0100
Hi Ossi, what is the power you have in the moment? Tell it in -X dB to full power if you want ;-) 73, Stefan <<winmail.dat>>
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00156.html (8,619 bytes)

94. AW: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:55:26 +0100
Pete, Try to ground your inv L at the end, e.g. with aluminium foil out of the household, say 5m*0,3m. The impedance will drop since the C will rise. Thus, the needed L and the voltage will decrease!
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00173.html (25,524 bytes)

95. AW: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz_grounding systems (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:16:40 +0100
So, the coil losses decrease with it's L (assuming a given wire diameter, coil diameter and spacing and so on) and thus it is good to decrease the needed L. So we have to spend a high coupling capac
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00179.html (11,537 bytes)

96. LF: AW: Re: VLF test signals? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:39:09 +0100
Tnx Jay, Uwe, Jean-Louis, group, Jay, that sounds to be a good RX concept. You do not have a band pass filter in the preamp? What about the 50Hz or 60Hz ;-) lines and the levels they generate at your
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00189.html (12,839 bytes)

97. LF: Who is transmitting "C" on 137.776kHz?? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:28:02 +0100
<<winmail.dat>>
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00196.html (8,667 bytes)

98. LF: AW: 9 Dreamers (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:14:21 +0100
Here i agree. And here i understand "dreamers" in a positive and optimistic way, just like children are dreamers! We have written so many mails (including me, of course ;-) ) und could start now just
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00220.html (11,501 bytes)

99. AW: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:36:05 +0100
Rik, Alan, I think we think about the same: using the inv-L as a vertical loop by using the ground. Wouldn't it be easier to use a aluminium foil to get proper C (to ground), especially when talking
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00230.html (26,943 bytes)

100. AW: LF: AW: Beaconing on 8.79 kHz in QRSS (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:32:16 +0100
Hello Horst, That sounds really nice. If it would be easy to find some motivated OMs in the near field (31km) ;-), that would be an interesting field to test. Yesterday i have thought about possible
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00240.html (11,736 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu