Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 421 ]

Total 421 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:32:25 +0000
I will continue to monitoring. I have several short dashes composted of several pixels which are 2-3dB stronger than the noise, timed between 01.00 UTC and 05.00 UTC and around10.00 UTC spot on frequ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00202.html (13,108 bytes)

22. LF: dj8wx overnight (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:10:58 +0000
Hi Uwe Your signal received overnight, strength is down from previous transmissions. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23312120/zjo_grab.jpg 73 Eddie G3ZJO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00203.html (8,967 bytes)

23. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:48:30 +0000
Hi Gary Thanks for the reply, first thing, for "10dB hump at 8.9kHz" read 20dB. Direct coupling of coax to the feed was killing the Q, I have added a 4 turn coupling loop. The flatness was only reall
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00204.html (13,484 bytes)

24. Re: LF: dj8wx overnight report (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:42:14 +0000
Thanks Uwe I think I see it forming, a little more time will tell. Eddie On 12/03/2011 21:22, [email protected] wrote: Eddie, at 2054UTC the TX has been switched on agn, now for a dash. it wil
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00205.html (14,920 bytes)

25. Re: LF: G3XIZ - VLF Transmitting now - 8.976 661kHz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:53:22 +0000
OK Chris Report will be a while, your frequency is outside both my running windows on 8.9kHz, I went to check for you after a time and you were above one set up and below the other Eddie On 12/03/201
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00219.html (10,293 bytes)

26. Re: LF: dj8wx-marginal? (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 11:39:13 +0000
Hi Uwe Many thanks for that. I can confirm LOS at 09.40UTC, although due to high noise levels at that time, only 3dB to 6dB less than your signal, I would have said 09.44UTC, not until 10.00UTC was t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00227.html (14,073 bytes)

27. Re: LF: G3XIZ signals (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:49:15 +0000
 Stephan Yes very true, I see the QRN is on the increase since midday. Eddie On 13/03/2011 13:42, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Good work Chris, Your motivation is impressing. You are the UK's VLF man (TX wi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00243.html (24,906 bytes)

28. Re: LF: OK2BVG_TX_8970 (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:57:47 +0000
Hello Wolf Yes Paul made Lubos' frequency a little lower than 8.970kHz, I measured my noisy line merely with the cross hairs at 8.96999863kHz. I am still not convinced. 73 Eddie G3ZJO   On 11/03/2011
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00255.html (12,358 bytes)

29. Re: LF: Ossi in the UK? (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:43:58 +0000
No Stefan, I haven't heard from Ossi since this morning, so I am in my usual state, of confusion. You don't have a well visible signal on the frequency in question in your 6000 window, I think there
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00258.html (10,860 bytes)

30. Re: LF: VLF G3XIZ - 12/13th March - Station Set UP - Advice Welcomed (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:10:27 +0000
Chris When are you starting your TXing tomorrow? If it one of those hours I don't have on my alarm clock I will leave it on all night. I have a window working on test now. Stefan note, working this t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00281.html (13,837 bytes)

31. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 19:40:45 +0000
Hi Gary Yes I see Jim 'tunes' his loop after the coax feed or is it HF filtering. My Loop is 800mm sq 50 turns and 3.6mH according to rjeloop. I am using SpecLab and PC 73 Eddie . On 05/03/2011 18:52
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00309.html (18,130 bytes)

32. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 23:59:31 +0000
Hi Jim Thanks for that, I knew we could depend on an analysis from you. You confirm my thoughts and findings, I went for a step tuned, low loss loop, I get 20dB gain around >1kHz wide on tuning to 9k
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00333.html (15,190 bytes)

33. Re: LF: VLF (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:16:35 +0000
Hi Uwe Your signal was not as strong as last night in IO92ng - 720km. Attached is my capture in 47uhz B/W. Ossi has some frequency drift so does not appear at this resolution. I have no explanation f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00336.html (12,149 bytes)

34. LF: dj8wx overnight (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:13:27 +0000
Uwe I nearly forgot, due a power outage at 0530UTC today I rescued your overnight capture until that time :- attached. Signal strength was down again. 73 Eddie G3ZJO Attachment: dj8wx_2500311-260311.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00340.html (9,194 bytes)

35. Re: LF: VLF reception - easily mistaken! (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:07:57 +0000
Thanks Gerhard my reference is also using GQD. From your Grabber I am unable to establish the Dash frequency of Lubo's transmission to the mHz level. My line measured here was 8970.039Hz what do you
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00369.html (12,344 bytes)

36. Re: LF: Re: VLF Stability and soundcard locking (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:27:10 +0000
Stefan I listened to that when you posted previously and waited to read the comments, I can't remember seeing any, maybe everyone was speechless like me, all I could manage was WOW. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00373.html (11,838 bytes)

37. Re: LF: vlf today (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:38:11 +0000
A stronger signal last night from DL8WX on 8970.02 go compare.com :-) companion site to confused.com :-) :- http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23312120/zjo_grab.jpg On 23/03/2011 09:01, mal hamilton wrote: VLF
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00378.html (9,211 bytes)

38. Re: LF: OK2BVG_TX_8970 (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:40:15 +0000
Hi Marcus Spoil the fun, no way, thank you for your observation, I read Paul's early query about 2 carriers and took the 80uHz as Lubos' signal, my line is in that region. At least you could see my l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00411.html (15,203 bytes)

39. Re: LF: vlf (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:05:39 +0000
Hello Ossi Your extra antenna current has improved your signal here in IO92ng. Congratulations, your signal was visible during the night, strongest around midnight. Capture shows Uwe's signal also. 7
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00412.html (9,872 bytes)

40. Re: LF: Re: DJ8WX copied overnight on 8.970022kHz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:54:26 +0000
Hi Uwe I was disappointed that your signal had faded so much,  now we know. Good luck with getting it sorted. Capture shows the previous dit and the truncated dah. Shame that it has wrecked my claim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00417.html (12,089 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu