Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

61. LF: 500: links for technical help (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:11:23 +0100
I've rather (too) quickly put a few links on the RSGB Spectrum Forum website aimed at helping newcomers to 500kHz. These are people who have not perhaps had the full baptism with 136kHz, so may appre
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00102.html (8,599 bytes)

62. RE: LF: First UK amateur sigs on 500k band? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:17:05 +0100
Well done Dave to get your station operational so quickly. The results are very interesting at the power level that you were using. Sadly I was in a pub having a meal last evening, so missed the fun.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00155.html (10,532 bytes)

63. LF: RE: Re: 501-504kHz reporting (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:32:20 +0100
Mal, sorry I don't know what's been issued as my input is early in the process. 73 John, G3WKL --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00214.html (13,442 bytes)

64. LF: RE: Guidelines for 501kHz SRP applications. {01} (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:16:38 +0100
Re the previous e-mail, which I am not sure got reflected, the guidelines for SRP applicants can now be viewed at http://www.rsgb-spectrumforum.org.uk/ofcom_501kHz_%20srp.htm 73 John, G3WKL RSGB HF M
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00295.html (11,548 bytes)

65. LF: 501-504kHz reporting (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:25:51 +0100
With several stations likely to be transmitting this weekend and as I will most likely be speaking with Ofcom on Monday re some of the applications under consideration, it would be helpful to the cau
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00343.html (12,011 bytes)

66. LF: RFI from 136kHz transmissions (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:30:11 +0100
In the discussion that I am currently having with Ofcom over the RFI assessment for 501-504kHz applications, the question has been raised as to whether interference has been noted with nearby neighbo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00365.html (10,054 bytes)

67. LF: Wandel & Goltermann TFH-2 (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:14:14 +0100
I've had one of the above field-strength meters for a while and could do with sight of an manual / circuit diagram. Done a search on the web, but with no luck. Can anyone offer any assitance with inf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00172.html (8,070 bytes)

68. LF: RE: Field Strength Meter (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:01:41 +0100
Chris, your experiments of measuring ERP are interesting. How close is the result that you obtained with that derived from aerial modelling and aerial current measurement? To what extent do you think
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00017.html (11,945 bytes)

69. Re: LF: Re: MF ERP Limit... (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 16:58:29 GMT
Roger, thanks for your suggestions below. Very envious of your quiet location.... Unless anyone else has some different views, can I suggest that we call the matter closed, for now. The key issue is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00026.html (9,578 bytes)

70. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:56:02 GMT
No Johan, not even copper these days... 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00044.html (9,092 bytes)

71. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 07:29:58 GMT
Jim, thanks for clarifying - I thought that you were opting more for the existing ERP approach. I feel that we are more likely to get a better response asking for an increase in ERP as this is easier
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00046.html (12,128 bytes)

72. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 07:18:17 GMT
Sadly not! More like water pipes at our daughter's home.... 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00047.html (9,358 bytes)

73. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:25:05 GMT
Thanks Jim, I tend to agree with you, but I'm not quite sure whether you are supporting the 20W power to the aerial limit, with the additional ERP ceiling that Rik was proposing. Apologies for not un
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00049.html (11,075 bytes)

74. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:35:14 GMT
Alan, thanks for your comments appreciating the work that has gone on these past years to get to this position. As I said in my reply to Laurence it's very much a team effort as you appreciate, with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00051.html (15,353 bytes)

75. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:36:59 GMT
Thanks Rik, that's an interesting thought to have a max ERP stipulated. It might make matters easier with Ofcom as they would be able to consider the worst case. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00052.html (10,220 bytes)

76. LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 21:26:01 GMT
Thought that I had better respond to Laurie's e-mail, now a few days ago. This is because the matter of the power level is to an extent under review by Ofcom. If you recall we, RSGB, asked back in 20
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00055.html (12,362 bytes)

77. Re: LF: 500kHz ERP (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 16:55:01 GMT
Thanks for your input, Marcus. You usefully considered the issue from a number of perspectives. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00061.html (12,465 bytes)

78. RE: LF: RE: 500 kHz license refused in the Netherlands (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:43:00 +0100
Thanks Jean-Louis, but the critical issue is whether REF have managed to convince Agence National des Frequencies to support the BNetzA proposal at WRC07. 73 John, G3WKL REF-Union too, within IARU is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00103.html (10,404 bytes)

79. RE: LF: RE: 500 kHz license refused in the Netherlands (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:43:00 +0100
Dick, that sounds positive, but the critical thing with be whether your radio agency will state at the WRC preparatory meeting later this month in Amsterdam (I believe) any support for the BNetzA pro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00104.html (15,105 bytes)

80. LF: RE: 500 kHz license refused in the Netherlands (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:09:43 +0100
Dick, sorry to hear that, but in a way it's understandable. Can I suggest that you contact Sioerd, PA0SHY, VERON HF Manager, and bring his attention to the posting by Ulrich, DK4VW, DARC HF Manager,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00108.html (13,024 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu