Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

21. RE: LF: CEPT: Common Frequency Allocations Table (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:45:51 +0100
Paul-Hendrik, I don't send the RSGB response, but looking at the ERO website (www.ero.dk - follow link to "active consultations") it looks like it should be e-mailed to [email protected] Changing the wor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00273.html (11,972 bytes)

22. LF: Extension of the UK's 500kHz NoVs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:19:57 +0100
The annual discussion with Ofcom surrounding the extension of the NoVs for 500kHz took place at the Ofcom/RSGB Forum yesterday. This followed a request at the September Forum meeting and was backed u
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00207.html (9,735 bytes)

23. LF: RE: Re: Extension of the UK's 500kHz NOVs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:30:43 +0100
Jim, Thanks for your comments. Your comment about out-of-band levels is correct. Ofcom's key concern in agreeing to raising our ERP level is that of the effect outside 501 - 504kHz; the reason that t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00213.html (10,019 bytes)

24. LF: RSGB 500kHz WG (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:42:29 +0100
To assist with the preparation for the agenda item (1.23) on 500kHz at WRC11, I'm looking to form a small working group within RSGB to help form a consensus view within the UK. The group's work will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00841.html (8,655 bytes)

25. Re: LF: RE: New NOV (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:10:53 +0000
Andy, Yes, letters are being sent out to all existing NoV holders. Re-application isn't necessary. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00178.html (10,001 bytes)

26. Re: LF: NoV Extensions (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:10:36 +0000
Ofcom have now sorted the omission of Andy's extended NoV - if there are any others still awaiting their new NoV in the post please contact me at [email protected] and I'll contact Ofcom on your b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00353.html (9,582 bytes)

27. Re: LF: Fw: EI--- 500khz permit applications (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:00:08 +0100
That's excellent news, Michael.  We were discussing the matter with IRTS in the margins of the Region 1 conference last year, so it's good to see some movement with COMREG. Drop me a direct e-mail (g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-03/msg00384.html (9,969 bytes)

28. Re: LF: GB4FRP CW QSO WITH VO1MRC 0100 HRS (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:05:15 +0100
Excellent result, well done.  Good luck for the rest of the event. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00190.html (10,998 bytes)

29. LF: New allocations for Norwegian radio Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:59:16 +0000
As of November 6th 2009 a number of additions to amateur radio licensing regulations in Norway went into force.  In addition to allocations at 5 and 70MHz access to 493 - 510 kHz on secondary basis,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00665.html (9,853 bytes)

30. Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:47:09 +0000
Several of us on this reflector are actively involved in the preparatory work, both within the ITU-R and CEPT WRC preparation structures.  We don't lack input from people experienced in these types o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00122.html (12,909 bytes)

31. Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access? (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:57:58 +0000
Just heard from the Sysop that he has increased the file size that can be reflected to 400kB. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00474.html (12,240 bytes)

32. Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access? (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:02:21 +0000
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00481.html (13,427 bytes)

33. Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access? (score: 1)
Author: John Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:08:16 +0000
Pete, Thanks for your comments.  I am sure that there are several solutions possible to having some form of accessible archive for information other than skeds, QSO outcomes, etc.  Whilst the current
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00495.html (17,567 bytes)

34. RE: LF: Test of bogus sender. (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 12:06:55 +0100
Thanks, also to Ian's comment on spam getting through. The sysop has made further changes to the config so hopefully all OK now.... famous last words! 73 John, G3WKL --Original Message-- From: owner-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00136.html (9,104 bytes)

35. LF: Config change (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:27:02 +0100
All, the config of the reflector has now been changed as discussed. If you are experiencing problems posting to the reflector please e-mail me direct via [email protected]. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00137.html (8,023 bytes)

36. RE: LF: Spam etc (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:24:40 +0100
If anyone is the moderator it's me folks - I started the whole thing some years ago, and yes I am monitoring the discussion! It's interesting to note that few apart from John and Dave have actually a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00138.html (11,698 bytes)

37. LF: HFC2004 - call for LF papers (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 22:14:52 +0100
I am now in a position to announce that this year's HF & IOTA Convention is being held at the Europa Hotel, Gatwick (22 - 24th October). Last year we only managed a couple of LF sessions as many of t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-05/msg00023.html (8,556 bytes)

38. LF: RSGB Spectrum Forum: raising concern over the Rugby Loran (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:39:46 +0100
I'll be attending a meeting of the RSGB Spectrum Forum on 9th June and plan to raise concern over the recent appearance of the Loran at Rugby in the agenda item concerning 136kHz. I will need to draf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00142.html (8,935 bytes)

39. RE: LF: Nevada Cup (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:11:36 +0100
Thanks Mike for raising awareness that nominations for this years award are now sought. I was away enjoying the Friedrichshafen Hamfest at the weekend and didn't see until my return that the announce
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00143.html (9,449 bytes)

40. LF: RE: RE: Watford Whistle (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:32:26 +0100
Thanks Jim, thanks for the info. I've never been able to locate where my underground cable runs across my property, but I'm encouraged to do some more work when time permits to track down and underst
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-07/msg00062.html (13,906 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu