To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: Test of bogus sender. |
From: | "John W Gould" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:05:52 -0000 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Thanks, also to Ian's comment on spam getting through. The sysop has made further changes to the config so hopefully all OK now.... famous last words! 73 John, G3WKL -----Original Message-----From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]Sent: 06 December 2003 02:49 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: Test of bogus sender.In a message dated 12/5/03 8:54:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] (an address which is not subscribed) writes:> If this message does _not_ get through... (etc) Oh dear. John D. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Config change, captbrian |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: WD2XDW back on after ice/snow removal and insulator "sweeping", Laurence KL1X |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Test of bogus sender., WarmSpgs |
Next by Thread: | LF: PL259s again, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |