Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: CEPT: Common Frequency Allocations Table

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: CEPT: Common Frequency Allocations Table
From: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:45:51 +0100
Cc: "'Paul-Henrik'" <[email protected]>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: Acj6Ybg/3ueYCaFdTHyZ95riHT4/6ABdvZGQ
Paul-Hendrik,

I don't send the RSGB response, but looking at the ERO website (www.ero.dk -
follow link to "active consultations") it looks like it should be e-mailed
to [email protected] 

Changing the wording slightly will make it look less contrived, Hi!

Hope that this helps

73 John, G3WKL

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul-Henrik [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: 09 August 2008 21:51
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: LF: CEPT: Common Frequency Allocations Table
>
>
>Hello again John!
>
>Where did RSGB send their response? A quick solution for us 
>(SRAL) is to do a copy/paste/replace job of relevant 500kHz 
>parts in the RSGB response and file it to CEPT under our own 
>flag. We are not sure where to send it so that it will be 
>officially recognized and received. Can you help us a little on this?
>
>This is the only way we can push 600m forward at the moment 
>here in Finland so it is a very welcome opportunity.
>
>Best regards
>
>Paul-Henrik Lindroos / OH1LSQ
>SRAL LF/MF manager
>
>
>
>Quoting John W Gould <[email protected]>:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> Thanks for the update on the SARL position.
>>
>> A SARL response to the ECC Report 25 consultation would be helpful - 
>> there are a few days left in which to do this!  We need to get more 
>> National Societies focused on agenda item 1.23 at WRC11 and making a 
>> stance with this report is a good starting point.
>>
>> 73 John, G3WKL
>>
>> >Hello John!
>> >
>> >This is just what we would need for the "500kHz" band here in 
>> >Finland. I have forwarded your mail to all concerned members in the 
>> >SRAL workgroup for frequency matters. I'm not sure if there is 
>> >anything more we can do at the moment because:
>> >
>> >We (SRAL) have already given our proposal regarding a 501-504kHz 
>> >allocation to FICORA (our OFCOM) and it has been recognized 
>by them. 
>> >They see no problem with an allocation in Finland but want to see a 
>> >CEPT desicion to go ahead. They refuse to bring up the subject 
>> >themseves within CEPT but in the last meeting I attended with them, 
>> >they promised to vote for any alike "500kHz" proposal if brought up 
>> >by another party within CEPT.
>> >
>> >Best Regards
>> >
>> >Paul-Henrik Lindroos / OH1LSQ
>> >SRAL LF/MF manager
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security 
>System. For more information please visit 
>http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
>______________________________________________________________________
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>