Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items
From:	John Gould <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:47:09 +0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PBnS+MUNQZoNlA4wfjdZG0iCqSUInaByz7irkNRz814=; b=b9m6DT/UGuMnYmVSdC6GATqu4+T283XFvOpy4GMjqhNNkqUG60TQ9QG5qdNtrJIlZv 22AH2Vcz1zRqA7A+OPimp18JZKdR6Q2gsGexMuLxEPo4+JkV7Z8uzAl6ZE9J/oOPV/UC KuXyelalGlCSxn+++jtjC1rYdg3PCR5uXEy0g=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=x1Ycbs044lxd/B9By1XOovbVowABIzh8o7G4z9DkZ3fWxHS+rZYsF4wizeBu4urKtw hLZ4/2OuCuZv9pB1GJe091dj1E2BAWZSj9XpGUVCQehpfwxehqn/EvbjKiyqjVn6wn9H HSU0b+oCa2Q92AKZjdnAx52d7ml7SlZR/ODjI=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Several of us on this reflector are actively involved in the preparatory work, both within the ITU-R and CEPT WRC preparation structures. We don't lack input from people experienced in these types of meetings, but we are seeking support from national societies particularly in those countries where Amateur activity is currently permitted around 500kHz. Thus, any encouragement that can be given to your national society to become engaged in the work would be really welcome. The way this can be done is for the HF Manager, or similar, of a national societies to join the Region 1 500kHz Working Group. Rik, ON7YD or I can supply further info if necessary.

73 John, G3WKL

2009/12/10 M0FMT <[email protected]>

FYI ??
"There is opposition to this proposal, primarily from the maritime service via the International Maritime Organisation and this has led to France presenting a paper under agenda item 1.10 that suggests a use for the band 495-505 kHz using datamodes. This was in response to papers from Canada and the UK that proposed a secondary amateur band between 493 and 510(515) kHz. There appears to be no commercial or technical reasoning behind this paper and it is suspected to be based on emotive grounds only. Nevertheless agenda item 1.23 still requires a lot more support if it is going to be successful."
73 petefmt

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

--
John, G3WKL

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items, M0FMT Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items, John RABSON Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items, M0FMT Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items, John RABSON Fwd: Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items, John RABSON Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items, M0FMT Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items, John Gould <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: 500kHz in Holland, mal hamilton
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes, Rik Strobbe
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items, M0FMT
Next by Thread:	LF: SAQ in CT, jrusgrove
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]