Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items
From: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1260456861; bh=ZaGW9BGPfHHbi6ILie5+4dmtkU3apg9lS/OZYKfrvkA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qDAoanCqGmA/cPw8Wecig3QaQpjgkuqS5H57ZAah0O55xnFrJEon8EzVU/Pyfjvc3DjG58Eay3MhLobLOyn2VX1q73oSkQlBxtZ+/B+5K9UAGjFwp0Uv+kNUWi8sHEGvugD9ER/oyE/JyZWJGP1AVe1ZhngN+Rm1l3dBEFVsxT0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nnhCz/saZoKPrWISy0LSyL1PQPfelpNKY8okgbVzpFxtTNr8rQqPTpwQYjyiW/94U8tOL4UK5dep8mX9Vs7ebN2HzOM48t3ZgFuGWwbP5FYJZ4NnChJ5Qq/5hW53jwqy28PxOg8v47LYimDvcMWXwAsaQ3kck/UY91tuiDgBzTk=;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi John
 
Have you received my parcel yet, with the soft rock ?
 
73 petefmt

--- On Thu, 10/12/09, John RABSON <[email protected]> wrote:

From: John RABSON <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 10 December, 2009, 12:11

I believe (though I can't find the reference) that someone in France made an informal enquiry - not via REF) about the equivalent of an NoV for 500.  The reply translated as "that part of the spectrum is not allocation to the amateur service".

F5VLF

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 10/12/2009 at 03:27 M0FMT wrote:

>FYI  ??
>"There is opposition to this proposal, primarily from the maritime service
>via the International Maritime Organisation and this has led to France
>presenting a paper under agenda item 1.10 that suggests a use for the band
>495-505 kHz using datamodes.  This was in response to papers from Canada
>and the UK that proposed a secondary amateur band between 493 and 510(515)
>kHz.  There appears to be no commercial or technical reasoning behind this
>paper and it is suspected to be based on emotive grounds
>only.  Nevertheless agenda item 1.23 still requires a lot more support if
>it is going to be successful."
>73 petefmt






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>